EVERY time we think we know more than God (setting ourselves up in His place) and try to improve/fix things we find ourselves in “It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time” world. For all that the Libs and unthinking environmentalists like(d) Rachel Carson, they conveniently ignore her chapter on the Kaibab deer in Grand Canyon and what happened. Here’s a link to a paper some years later. Anyone want to lay bets on this latest brainstorm for “artificial” trees? Seriously? Artificial? http://www.rmtrr.org/data/Binkleyetal_2006_Ecosystems.pdf. Summary pg 14.
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Is the artificial tree the solution to climate change? There have been a number of stories advocating artificial trees recently. Proponents of artificial trees believe that normal trees haven’t got the capacity to deliver the CO2 reductions they want. They insist we should try to improve on nature, by replacing natural respiration, with industrial scale absorption and disposal of CO2.
For example, consider the following story;
Is an artificial tree part of the solution to climate change? These guys think so.
… What if we had a way to suck that excess the CO2 right back out of the sky?
Well, actually, we do, says Chris Jones, a chemical engineer at Georgia Tech in Atlanta.
“These are our best ways of capturing CO2 from the air,” Jones says as he walks under a canopy of trees on the school’s…
View original post 268 more words